Re: Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE

From: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jing Wang <jingwangian(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE
Date: 2017-09-05 07:45:55
Message-ID: CALAY4q-WzJ9JZpXWryGH+iYnxVSJdxVVz3Xpzg=fm1K1YkFfMw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

i can't apply your patch cleanly i think it needs rebase

Regards

Surafel

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Jing Wang <jingwangian(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Enclosed please find the patch only for the pg_dump using the 'comment on
> current_database' statement.
>
> This patch should be working with the previous patch which is
> comment_on_current_database_no_pgdump_v3.patch
>
> Regards,
> Jing Wang
> Fujitsu Australia
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2017-09-05 07:46:15 Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2017-09-05 07:40:21 Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6