| From: | Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ryan Lambert <ryan(at)rustprooflabs(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Rémi Lapeyre <remi(dot)lapeyre(at)lenstra(dot)fr>, Eli Marmor <eli(at)netmask(dot)it>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Georgios <gkokolatos(at)protonmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table |
| Date: | 2021-01-16 18:39:38 |
| Message-ID: | CALAY4q-MGmStgenU_fA0XHkkXdHy64r8d1kAfbs+1TT912zMhw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 8:02 PM Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> There are no existing applications, so for PostgreSQL, it wouldn't be an
> issue.
>
>
Yes we don't have but the main function of ALTER TABLE foo ADD SYSTEM
VERSIONING
is to add system versioning functionality to existing application
regards
Surafel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vik Fearing | 2021-01-16 19:12:30 | Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2021-01-16 17:39:28 | Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes |