Re: A rather hackish POC for alternative implementation of WITH TIES

From: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: A rather hackish POC for alternative implementation of WITH TIES
Date: 2020-03-26 07:22:26
Message-ID: CALAY4q-B0aOH+3VzzMcW4canQKacuMdbbHhoARwhXEchsCicTA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 3:35 PM Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
wrote:

> >>>>> "Alvaro" == Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>
>
> I was largely holding off on doing further work hoping for some
> discussion of which way we should go. If you think my approach is worth
> pursuing (I haven't seriously tested the performance, but I'd expect it
> to be slower than Surafel's - the price you pay for flexibility) then I
> can look at it further, but figuring out the planner stuff will take
> some time.
>
>
Other alternative can be pushing the existing implementation
which will be open to change in case of better-finished
implementation.

regards
Surafel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2020-03-26 07:25:46 Re: Unicode normalization SQL functions
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-03-26 06:56:33 Re: Include sequence relation support in logical replication