From: | Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: A rather hackish POC for alternative implementation of WITH TIES |
Date: | 2020-03-26 07:22:26 |
Message-ID: | CALAY4q-B0aOH+3VzzMcW4canQKacuMdbbHhoARwhXEchsCicTA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 3:35 PM Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
wrote:
> >>>>> "Alvaro" == Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>
>
> I was largely holding off on doing further work hoping for some
> discussion of which way we should go. If you think my approach is worth
> pursuing (I haven't seriously tested the performance, but I'd expect it
> to be slower than Surafel's - the price you pay for flexibility) then I
> can look at it further, but figuring out the planner stuff will take
> some time.
>
>
Other alternative can be pushing the existing implementation
which will be open to change in case of better-finished
implementation.
regards
Surafel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2020-03-26 07:25:46 | Re: Unicode normalization SQL functions |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-03-26 06:56:33 | Re: Include sequence relation support in logical replication |