Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table

From: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ryan Lambert <ryan(at)rustprooflabs(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Rémi Lapeyre <remi(dot)lapeyre(at)lenstra(dot)fr>, Eli Marmor <eli(at)netmask(dot)it>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Georgios <gkokolatos(at)protonmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table
Date: 2021-01-26 16:39:18
Message-ID: CALAY4q-4YpPc=hSGpxCJBVwpTKzm2A5JyoXUr+2Lh0KTiUcjPQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 2:33 PM Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> wrote:

> I'm still in the weeds of reviewing this patch, but why should this
> fail? It should not fail.
>

Attached is rebased patch that include isolation test

regards
Surafel

Attachment Content-Type Size
system-versioning-temporal-table_2021_v13.patch text/x-patch 144.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2021-01-26 17:20:41 Re: Error on failed COMMIT
Previous Message Surafel Temesgen 2021-01-26 16:29:11 Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option