Re: security_definer_search_path GUC

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
To: Joel Jacobson <joel(at)compiler(dot)org>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: security_definer_search_path GUC
Date: 2021-06-02 22:55:39
Message-ID: CAL9smLAR1Zg2DZzbB__Zxe1GsJG8_0m-V-V+bkgJMoz6E+cn8w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 11:32 PM Joel Jacobson <joel(at)compiler(dot)org> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 2, 2021, at 18:36, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
>
> The use case is: version upgrades. I want to be able to have a
> search_path of something like 'pg_catalog, compat, public'. That way we
> can provide compatibility versions of newer functions in the "compat"
> schema, which get taken over by pg_catalog when running on a newer
> version. That way all the compatibility crap is clearly separated from the
> stuff that should be in "public".
>
>
> That's a neat trick, probably the best solution in a really old PostgreSQL
> version, before we had extensions.
>
> But if running a recent PostgreSQL version, with support for extensions, I
> think an even cleaner solution
> would be to package such compatibility versions in a "compat" extension,
> that would just install them into the public schema.
>

Writing, verifying and shipping extension upgrade scripts is not pleasant.
I'd much prefer something that's integrated to the workflow I already have.

> And if you wonder what functions in public come from the compat extension,
> you can use use \dx+.
>

They still show up everywhere when looking at "public". So this is only
slightly better, and a maintenance burden.

.m

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2021-06-02 23:02:17 Re: Performance degradation of REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW
Previous Message Marko Tiikkaja 2021-06-02 22:50:17 Re: security_definer_search_path GUC