Re: [PERFORM] Parallel Select query performance and shared buffers

From: Metin Doslu <metin(at)citusdata(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Parallel Select query performance and shared buffers
Date: 2013-12-04 13:19:29
Message-ID: CAL1dPcerFdFksv+FYsx4QWaJFdzU_LSbHSppjjNxuX4zb=v-Jw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

> Maybe you could help test this patch:
>
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20131115194725.GG5489@awork2.anarazel.de

Which repository should I apply these patches. I tried main repository, 9.3
stable and source code of 9.3.1, and in my trials at least of one the
patches is failed. What patch command should I use?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-12-04 13:46:24 Re: ruleutils vs. empty targetlists
Previous Message MauMau 2013-12-04 12:21:19 [bug fix] psql's \conninfo reports incorrect destination on Windows

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Freire 2013-12-04 16:27:10 Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Select query performance and shared buffers
Previous Message Metin Doslu 2013-12-04 12:19:03 Re: Parallel Select query performance and shared buffers