From: | itishree sukla <itishree(dot)sukla(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Check Pointer |
Date: | 2013-05-30 12:45:04 |
Message-ID: | CAL-g6VRhxV=0SQoTSotmr6qzW_-sUd=ynjJzyFqdUxcEbafVnw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Thanks for the quick response. Below is the out put of Top Commnd.
3971 postgres 20 0 8048m 303m 301m S 0 0.9 0:04.34
/usr/lib/postgresql/9.2/bin/postgres -D /var/lib/postgresql/9.2/main -c
config_file=/etc/postgre
3972 postgres 20 0 66828 1820 708 S 0 0.0 1:36.37 postgres:
logger
process
3974 postgres 20 0 8054m 7.6g 7.6g S 0 24.1 0:56.59 postgres:
checkpointer
process
3975 postgres 20 0 8051m 895m 891m S 0 2.8 0:04.98 postgres:
writer
process
3976 postgres 20 0 8051m 9m 9072 S 0 0.0 0:35.17 postgres: wal
writer
process
3977 postgres 20 0 70932 3352 716 S 0 0.0 0:05.19 postgres:
stats collector
process
1
Postgresql =9.2.3
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com
> wrote:
> On 30.05.2013 15:09, itishree sukla wrote:
>
>> In our server Check pointer process is consuming 8 GB of memory, what
>> could
>> be the possible reason? Can any one please help.
>>
>
> Are you sure you're measuring the memory correctly? The RES field in top
> output, for example, includes shared memory, ie. the whole buffer cache.
> Shared memory isn't really "consumed" by the checkpointer process, but
> shared by all postgres processes.
>
> - Heikki
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2013-05-30 13:55:57 | Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2? |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2013-05-30 12:26:39 | Re: Check Pointer |