Re: Should pgAdmin 3 be saved?

From: Gabriel Martin <grafik(dot)muzik(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should pgAdmin 3 be saved?
Date: 2021-02-07 16:11:36
Message-ID: CAKzNfLQcDigY-cHcA-Cf+z0W=2cWENd3P1RPE_+JrONie6JTag@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks for the answer, Tom. It's nice to get an answer so quickly ;)

Following your advice, I will probably post something about this on
the "pgadmin-hackers" list, a sub-list of the project lists dedicated
to "pgAdmin development and patches." I'm just going to wait a little
bit before, in order to let people react here and to avoid being on
multiple mailing lists at the same time.

I'm crossing my fingers that someone competent perceives the interest
of not letting pgAdmin 3 die completely. It would be great to keep the
good old PgAdmin App Version (aka PgAdmin 3) functional in parallel to
the newer Hosted Web Version of PgAdmin (aka PgAdmin 4).

regards, gm

Le sam. 6 févr. 2021, à 14 h 26, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> a écrit :
>
> Gabriel Martin <grafik(dot)muzik(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Do you think there's a possibility that people could fix pgAdmin 3, even if
> > it means making a fork or whatever?
>
> You'd probably be better advised to ask this on the pgadmin project lists.
>
> Certainly, anybody who cares to fork and maintain pgAdmin 3 could do so.
> It's a matter of finding people with the time, interest, and technical
> ability.
>
> regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-02-07 22:25:14 Re: SV: Problem with pg_notify / listen
Previous Message Peter J. Holzer 2021-02-07 11:44:04 Re: vacuumdb not letting me connect to db