| From: | Roberto Mello <roberto(dot)mello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: The PostgreSQL C Dialect |
| Date: | 2026-06-22 22:10:53 |
| Message-ID: | CAKz==b+QFmowxREUekitnebDCCgZ449rjBcYqWu0uF-a4FobfQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Very nice.
Given the many emdashes in the text, can I ask if you used an LLM to write
it? If so, which one?
And importantly, if an LLM was used (no issues there) did you ask a
different model to double-check every statement it makes, just to be sure?
Thanks,
Roberto
On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 1:39 PM Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com> wrote:
> When I was writing my first PostgreSQL extension, I was at sea on a lot of
> the conventions that make up the "PostgreSQL C Dialect." I've taken my
> notes, added some additional things that confused me, and put it up on the
> wiki for review:
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/The_PostgreSQL_C_Dialect
>
> Feedback welcome, of course!
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kirk Wolak | 2026-06-22 22:17:14 | [PATCH v1] Allow excluded tables to remain in the pg_restore data-loading path for directory-format dumps |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2026-06-22 21:50:49 | Re: [RFC PATCH v0 0/7] Add EXPLAIN ANALYZE wait event reporting |