ISO8859_1 vs UTF-8 Performance?

From: Caroline Beltran <caroline(dot)d(dot)beltran(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: ISO8859_1 vs UTF-8 Performance?
Date: 2013-10-22 23:15:57
Message-ID: CAKsZF8_1K8njki7+LH9zQkHwqxTxvumtiHc+2uZrAiJ5j9ybLw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I am not a PostgresSQL user but would like to hear from users who have
configured their database to use the UTF-8 charset, especially any users
using the case and accent insensitive collation.

I am using a open source SQL server at this time using ISO8859_1 and
performance is excellent but I recreated the structure using UTF-8 and
imported the data in a test environment and the performance was totally
unacceptable. Example:

An unoptimized (no index) query under ISO8859_1 runs in about 15ms and took
almost 6.5 seconds under UTF-8.

Creating an index did help but performance was still unacceptable. Using
the same query under ISO8859_1 now took a reported 0ms while taking 109ms
under UTF-8.

Thank you for your time

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2013-10-22 23:39:32 Re: ISO8859_1 vs UTF-8 Performance?
Previous Message ramistuni 2013-10-22 23:10:48 Re: Upgrade from 9.1 to 9.10