| From: | Caroline Beltran <caroline(dot)d(dot)beltran(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | ISO8859_1 vs UTF-8 Performance? |
| Date: | 2013-10-22 23:15:57 |
| Message-ID: | CAKsZF8_1K8njki7+LH9zQkHwqxTxvumtiHc+2uZrAiJ5j9ybLw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
I am not a PostgresSQL user but would like to hear from users who have
configured their database to use the UTF-8 charset, especially any users
using the case and accent insensitive collation.
I am using a open source SQL server at this time using ISO8859_1 and
performance is excellent but I recreated the structure using UTF-8 and
imported the data in a test environment and the performance was totally
unacceptable. Example:
An unoptimized (no index) query under ISO8859_1 runs in about 15ms and took
almost 6.5 seconds under UTF-8.
Creating an index did help but performance was still unacceptable. Using
the same query under ISO8859_1 now took a reported 0ms while taking 109ms
under UTF-8.
Thank you for your time
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John R Pierce | 2013-10-22 23:39:32 | Re: ISO8859_1 vs UTF-8 Performance? |
| Previous Message | ramistuni | 2013-10-22 23:10:48 | Re: Upgrade from 9.1 to 9.10 |