From: | Luca Ferrari <fluca1978(at)infinito(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: What do we need for new PUGs? |
Date: | 2015-03-04 10:05:18 |
Message-ID: | CAKoxK+49c1Kr7yfZzV8Ahv0iw0aD5fhYGAYdRkE6jyapVKgNrw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Ciao,
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm especially looking for some feedback here from our *international*
> audience; what works in the USA will be different from what works elsewhere.
I'm speaking for the ITPUG here.
What we have "now" is something more complex than a single mailing
list. In particular we run a VPS which hosts a git repository for our
internal documents, as well as an issue tracker to schedule and manage
activities.
We have also a couple of private mailing lists, as well as an
italian-only planet and an official web site.
Besides, we have current and old PGDay.IT web sites and another couple
of gadgets.
For a new PUG my 2c are to a mailing list and a web space, possibly
already connected to the official planet. As Stephen, I believe the
real problem is not strictly connected to the infrastructure but in
the way the PUG presents itself and its activity to the world.
Luca
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Szymon Guz | 2015-03-04 10:55:16 | PostgreSQL Windows Installer Licence |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-03-04 00:46:47 | Re: What do we need for new PUGs? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gilberto Castillo | 2015-03-04 13:40:20 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] What do we need for new PUGs? |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-03-04 00:46:47 | Re: What do we need for new PUGs? |