Re: Skip index cleanup if autovacuum did not do any work

From:	Feike Steenbergen <feikesteenbergen(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:	PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: Skip index cleanup if autovacuum did not do any work
Date:	2017-11-28 21:43:23
Message-ID:	CAK_s-G0kqZ2bBy5PQOApQBCT0MWq80pUTvQc69MtaSrU9rVbbQ@mail.gmail.com
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2017-11-28 21:36:05 from Feike Steenbergen <feikesteenbergen(at)gmail(dot)com> 📎  2017-11-28 21:43:23 from Feike Steenbergen <feikesteenbergen(at)gmail(dot)com> 📎  2017-11-28 21:48:53 from Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>   2017-11-28 21:54:32 from Feike Steenbergen <feikesteenbergen(at)gmail(dot)com>  2017-11-28 21:55:03 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>   2017-11-28 22:00:39 from Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>  2017-11-28 22:17:48 from Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>   2017-11-29 11:39:17 from Feike Steenbergen <feikesteenbergen(at)gmail(dot)com>
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

Attachment	Content-Type	Size
0002-skip_cleanup_for_stale_relation.patch	application/octet-stream	949 bytes

In response to

• Skip index cleanup if autovacuum did not do any work at 2017-11-28 21:36:05 from Feike Steenbergen

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Robert Haas	2017-11-28 21:44:55	Re: [HACKERS] Assertion failure when the non-exclusive pg_stop_backup aborted.
Previous Message	Robert Haas	2017-11-28 21:40:49	Re: [HACKERS] PG10 partitioning - odd behavior/possible bug