| From: | Feike Steenbergen <feikesteenbergen(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg18: Virtual generated columns are not (yet) safe when superuser selects from them |
| Date: | 2025-06-05 13:54:28 |
| Message-ID: | CAK_s-G0iCtUbi-oPSxrseNeu463Jywq7rzRFkaoh1M79Cs7p5w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 at 12:49, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> I propose to address this by not allowing the use of user-defined
> functions in generation expressions for now. The attached patch
> implements this. This assumes that all built-in functions are
> trustworthy, for this purpose, which seems likely true and likely
desirable.
>
> I think the feature is still useful like that, and this approach
> provides a path to add new functionality in the future that grows this
> set of allowed functions, for example by allowing some configurable set
> of "trusted" functions or whatever.
+1
I really like this feature and it would be great if it gets into
pg18, even with some restrictions, thank you
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2025-06-05 14:06:14 | Re: Question Regarding Merge Append and Parallel Execution of Index Scans on Partitioned Table |
| Previous Message | Ayush Vatsa | 2025-06-05 13:47:28 | Re: Question Regarding Merge Append and Parallel Execution of Index Scans on Partitioned Table |