Re: pg_stat_io_histogram

From: Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Ants Aasma <ants(dot)aasma(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_io_histogram
Date: 2026-02-23 12:27:10
Message-ID: CAKZiRmw1CpN=d3b3yj9TASKrVx--UFG0pPN4c5w5eTkPGfeTHg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 6:37 PM Ants Aasma <ants(dot)aasma(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:

[..]
> I think performance wise the patch is fine as is, there is negligible
> performance overhead even in most adverse conditions.

Awesome, thank You very much Ants for those measurements! You had quite
already quite exchange with Andres on this topic, so I'll just respond
to some concern in follow-up emails.

-J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jakub Wartak 2026-02-23 12:30:44 Re: pg_stat_io_histogram
Previous Message lakshmi 2026-02-23 12:12:49 Re: parallel data loading for pgbench -i