From: | Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Keeps tracking the uniqueness with UniqueKey |
Date: | 2020-04-29 00:34:59 |
Message-ID: | CAKU4AWrF2OO+miCw=41+a7KFBYTwgv1YgOKdvP6foZ8TU09ZhA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 8:29 AM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 14:17, Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > V6 also includes:
> > 1. Fix the comment misleading you mentioned above.
> > 2. Fixed a concern case for `relation_has_uniquekeys_for` function.
>
> Over on [1], Richard highlights a problem in the current join removals
> lack of ability to remove left joins unless the min_righthand side of
> the join is a singleton rel. It's my understanding that the reason the
> code checks for this is down to the fact that join removals used
> unique indexed to prove the uniqueness of the relation and obviously,
> those can only exist on base relations. I wondered if you might want
> to look into a 0003 patch which removes that restriction? I think this
> can be done now since we no longer look at unique indexes to provide
> the proves that the join to be removed won't duplicate outer side
> rows.
>
Yes, I think that would be another benefit of UniqueKey, but it doesn't
happen
until now. I will take a look of it today and fix it in a separated
commit.
Best Regards
Andy Fan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rui DeSousa | 2020-04-29 00:40:57 | Re: PostgreSQL CHARACTER VARYING vs CHARACTER VARYING (Length) |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-04-29 00:34:00 | Re: PostgreSQL CHARACTER VARYING vs CHARACTER VARYING (Length) |