| From: | Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Subplan result caching |
| Date: | 2020-05-21 01:40:58 |
| Message-ID: | CAKU4AWqNx4940XDkJL101Fb0SsycZ6nn=-fAVvrrzrOAF5gLng@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 7:47 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 at 00:37, Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I was feeling that we may have to maintain some extra status if we use
> hash
> > table rather than tuple store, but that might be not a major concern. I
> can
> > wait and see your patch.
>
> I've posted the patch and lots of details about it in
>
> https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrPcQyQdWERGYWx8J+2DLUNgXu+fOSbQ1UscxrunyXyrQ@mail.gmail.com
>
>
Amazing! I will start to study it today.
--
Best Regards
Andy Fan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-05-21 02:25:35 | Re: Optimizer docs typos |
| Previous Message | Ranier Vilela | 2020-05-21 01:37:36 | Re: Parallel Seq Scan vs kernel read ahead |