| From: | Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CATUPDATE confusion? |
| Date: | 2015-03-06 15:36:25 |
| Message-ID: | CAKRt6CQUA+mFS0Qcoe862R1hyeae+ZOHK=C1Eza9RgtCFYSEUw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
All,
Thanks for all the feedback and review.
> I think I vote for (1). I do not like (2) because of the argument I made
> > upthread that write access on system catalogs is far more dangerous than
> > a naive DBA might think. (0) has some attraction but really CATUPDATE
> > is one more concept than we need.
>
> I agree with #1 on this.
>
#1 makes sense to me as well. The current version of the patch takes this
approach. Also, I have verified against 'master' as of c6ee39b.
Thanks,
Adam
--
Adam Brightwell - adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com
Database Engineer - www.crunchydatasolutions.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-03-06 15:49:02 | Re: MD5 authentication needs help |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-03-06 15:30:08 | Re: MD5 authentication needs help |