From: | Vitaly Burovoy <vitaly(dot)burovoy(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Serge Rielau <serge(at)rielau(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fast AT ADD COLUMN with DEFAULTs |
Date: | 2016-10-05 23:19:33 |
Message-ID: | CAKOSWNnxF2WXJb=buRoS+uucurPxh1TEpOTb4DsPEEaE3rzMAA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/5/16, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Need a better name for the concept, since evidently this name isn't
>> conveying the idea.
>
> Maybe "creation default" would work better? Point being it's the
> default value at the time of column creation.
Hmm... Personaly for me the original topic name is good enough.
But what I discover for myself is that we have pg_attrdef separately
from the pg_attribute. Why?
Is it time to join them? For not presented defaults it would be only
one bit per row(if we avoid "adsrc" as it is recommended), but for a
separate table it is 11 columns with two indexes now...
--
Best regards,
Vitaly Burovoy
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-10-05 23:24:03 | Re: pg_rewind hangs if --source-server is used and syncrep is enabled |
Previous Message | Pantelis Theodosiou | 2016-10-05 23:17:04 | Re: Fast AT ADD COLUMN with DEFAULTs |