Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop orphan temp tables in single-mode

From: Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Grigory Smolkin <g(dot)smolkin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop orphan temp tables in single-mode
Date: 2019-06-08 04:16:49
Message-ID: CAKNkYnzLKkPnVq6UV+gQjLO734+MOWvzpGNgSJVyec9ejTV4JA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello Alexander,

On Friday, June 7, 2019, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
wrote:
> BTW, does this patch checks that temporary table is really orphan?
> AFAICS, user may define some temporary tables in single-user mode
> before running VACUUM.

As far as I remember, the patch checks it.

--
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company

--
Artur

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2019-06-08 06:11:03 Re: Bloom Indexes - bit array length and the total number of bits (or hash functions ?? ) !
Previous Message Avinash Kumar 2019-06-08 02:43:08 Bloom Indexes - bit array length and the total number of bits (or hash functions ?? ) !