Re: Feature: temporary materialized views

From: Mitar <mmitar(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Feature: temporary materialized views
Date: 2019-01-11 19:47:54
Message-ID: CAKLmikNZUn_aTNzvjTZTGReEUoevF+3hTfd2FmZf_9wqLdvZVw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi!

On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 8:51 AM Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> wrote:
> Her is quick initial review. I will do more testing later.

Thanks for doing the review!

> In create_ctas_internal() why do you copy the relation even when you do
> not modify it?

I was modelling this after code in view.c [1]. I can move copy into the "if".

> Is it really ok to just remove SECURITY_RESTRICTED_OPERATION from
> ExecCreateTableAs()? I feel it is there for a good reason and that we
> preferably want to reduce the duration of SECURITY_RESTRICTED_OPERATION
> to only include when we actually execute the query.

The comment there said that this is not really necessary for security:

"This is not necessary for security, but this keeps the behavior
similar to REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW. Otherwise, one could create a
materialized view not possible to refresh."

Based on my experimentation, this is required to be able to use
temporary materialized views, but it does mean one has to pay
attention from where one can refresh. For example, you cannot refresh
from outside of the current session, because temporary object is not
available there. I have not seen any other example where refresh would
not be possible.

This is why I felt comfortable removing this. Also, no test failed
after removing this.

[1] https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/master/src/backend/commands/view.c#L554

Mitar

--
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-01-11 19:54:55 Re: Ryu floating point output patch
Previous Message Mike Rylander 2019-01-11 19:39:50 Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs