From: | Mitar <mmitar(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: CREATE UNLOGGED MATERIALIZED VIEW |
Date: | 2018-12-25 18:29:05 |
Message-ID: | CAKLmikNE81RcbzgBwioaHVCp0joz2WioPRLaw+tCw=MNWRD1mA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi!
On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 10:25 AM Adrian Klaver
<adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> wrote:
> Don't know. From my POV MATERIALIZED VIEWS are transient any way you
> look at them. They capture a state at a point in time and then the data
> they depend on moves on. Given that they can be refreshed at will not
> sure logging/not logging really matters.
I agree with you. But current default is RELPERSISTENCE_PERMANENT. So
there is an option for RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED.
So, I think that we should or a) make RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED default,
b) document RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED or c) remove it.
I propose b).
Mitar
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-12-26 16:35:05 | Re: CREATE UNLOGGED MATERIALIZED VIEW |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2018-12-25 18:25:23 | Re: CREATE UNLOGGED MATERIALIZED VIEW |