| From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: path toward faster partition pruning |
| Date: | 2017-09-26 21:04:10 |
| Message-ID: | CAKJS1f_hvFjTXS6zDjgdXQtYAbxLZpw9v_Br99RHFnD_P5u0sA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 25 September 2017 at 23:04, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> By the way, I'm now rebasing these patches on top of [1] and will try to
> merge your refactoring patch in some appropriate way. Will post more
> tomorrow.
>
> [1] https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=9140cf826
Yeah, I see 0001 conflicts with that. I'm going to set this to waiting
on author while you're busy rebasing this.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2017-09-26 21:14:19 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? |
| Previous Message | Maksim Milyutin | 2017-09-26 20:25:07 | Re: [BUG] Cache invalidation for queries that contains const of temporary composite type |