| From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn() |
| Date: | 2017-05-04 15:36:39 |
| Message-ID: | CAKJS1f_fcD3LXoUhiuPz0eWuDOLf296kxvZ=DpiBbMiznqx3Ug@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2 May 2017 at 00:10, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 20 April 2017 at 07:29, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> wrote:
>> 2017-04-19 1:32 GMT-03:00 Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>>>
>>> I vote for "location" -> "lsn". I would expect complains about the
>>> current inconsistency at some point, and the function names have been
>>> already changed for this release..
>
> OK, so I've created a draft patch which does this.
I ended up adding this to the open items list. I feel it's best to be
on there so that we don't forget about this.
If we decide not to do it then we can just remove it from the list,
but it would be a shame to release the beta having forgotten to make
this change.
Do any of the committers who voted for this change feel inclined to
pick this patch up?
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-05-04 15:36:50 | Re: CTE inlining |
| Previous Message | Serge Rielau | 2017-05-04 15:04:09 | Re: CTE inlining |