Re: Performance regression with PostgreSQL 11 and partitioning

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Thomas Reiss <thomas(dot)reiss(at)dalibo(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance regression with PostgreSQL 11 and partitioning
Date: 2018-05-30 03:01:02
Message-ID: CAKJS1f_2=68RdOJVBdBJDdyizrYjQy+SM_vHL2unkszbGcmt3Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 26 May 2018 at 02:30, Thomas Reiss <thomas(dot)reiss(at)dalibo(dot)com> wrote:
> I spent some time to test the new features on partitioning with the
> beta1. I noticed a potentially huge performance regression with
> plan-time partition pruning.

Thanks for reporting. I've added this item to the PG11 open items list in:

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_11_Open_Items#Open_Issues

I've placed it there so that it does not get forgotten about. It's
still to be decided if we can come up with something low-risk enough
that will resolve the issue.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Charles Cui 2018-05-30 04:42:11 [GSoC] json helper functions
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-05-30 02:48:20 Re: Supporting tls-server-end-point as SCRAM channel binding for OpenSSL 1.0.0 and 1.0.1