Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Ordered Partitioned Table Scans
Date: 2019-03-15 16:44:40
Message-ID: CAKJS1f9xm2UjWwqy2EksmPOkYfOk5sWOvahijtjd2JjG3ahCqg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 16 Mar 2019 at 04:22, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I've attached an updated patch which fixes the conflict with 0a9d7e1f6d8

... and here's the one that I should have sent. (renamed to v12 to
prevent confusion)

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
v12-0001-Allow-Append-to-be-used-in-place-of-MergeAppend-.patch application/octet-stream 63.8 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-03-15 16:48:31 Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS)
Previous Message Michael Kefeder 2019-03-15 16:42:26 Re: GTIN14 support for contrib/isn