Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY
Date: 2019-03-14 10:12:00
Message-ID: CAKJS1f9s9ud0-vycRg3VUYzocshb6z8ODsSwHijBq9Tgq-nykg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 10:13, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Would anyone like to argue that there is any other reason not to
> commit these patches?

Hi Robert,

Thanks for working on this. I'm sorry I didn't get a chance to
dedicate some time to look at it.

It looks like you've pushed all of this now. Can the CF entry be
marked as committed?

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2019-03-14 10:20:08 Re: COPY FREEZE and setting PD_ALL_VISIBLE/visibility map bits
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2019-03-14 10:09:42 Re: Timeout parameters