| From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Run-time pruning for ModifyTable |
| Date: | 2019-07-03 07:34:03 |
| Message-ID: | CAKJS1f9j8r6ap963qrgPdCxkTtj2Kr=tmNm_w9eZ1+Nyf=ksAA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 at 17:27, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> A cursory look at the patch suggests that most of its changes will be
> for nothing if [1] materializes. What do you think about that?
Yeah, I had this in mind when writing the patch, but kept going
anyway. I think it's only really a small patch of this patch that
would get wiped out with that change. Just the planner.c stuff.
Everything else is still required, as far as I understand.
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/357.1550612935%40sss.pgh.pa.us
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-07-03 07:34:54 | Re: Custom table AMs need to include heapam.h because of BulkInsertState |
| Previous Message | Oleksandr Shulgin | 2019-07-03 07:29:32 | Re: POC: converting Lists into arrays |