| From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, "Li, Zheng" <zhelli(at)amazon(dot)com>, "Finnerty, Jim" <jfinnert(at)amazon(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: NOT IN subquery optimization |
| Date: | 2019-03-05 23:25:46 |
| Message-ID: | CAKJS1f9VqhSq3KRaz8Npsj-xFgSw8FAf=O8knCaSuJKgosknHQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 03:37, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> writes:
> > I'm not sure if I have an issue with competing patches on the same
> > thread. I've seen that before and it can lead to a good outcome. It
> > case, as you say, also lead to confusion.
>
> It's a bit of a shame that the cfbot will only be testing one of them
> at a time if we leave it like this. I kind of lean towards the
> two-thread, two-CF-entry approach because of that. The amount of
> confusion is a constant.
That sounds fine. I'll take mine elsewhere since I didn't start this thread.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-03-05 23:26:36 | Re: Allowing extensions to supply operator-/function-specific info |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2019-03-05 23:23:14 | Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL |