| From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A small tweak to some comments for PartitionKeyData |
| Date: | 2018-10-25 03:54:58 |
| Message-ID: | CAKJS1f9T0TJjAL8ANXmJrfp3DjcCVabyKWm1m7bDZPPThvZ0QA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 25 October 2018 at 16:46, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> + * key, one for each zero-valued partattrs */
>
> How about: for each zero-valued member of partattrs?
Aren't arrays made up of elements? I did have "element" on the end,
but I didn't think it was worth having the extra line caused by the 80
line length limit, so I deleted it.
Seems "element" is mentioned 73 times in [1], but "member" does not
get a mention.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Array_data_structure
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2018-10-25 04:05:34 | Re: A small tweak to some comments for PartitionKeyData |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2018-10-25 03:46:44 | Re: A small tweak to some comments for PartitionKeyData |