Re: Performance improvements of INSERTs to a partitioned table

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: "Kato, Sho" <kato-sho(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance improvements of INSERTs to a partitioned table
Date: 2018-11-10 09:29:09
Message-ID: CAKJS1f9SepyZzmZrSCF8DBMtNvzouLYzbpeDULB4dZiG2BvVbw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9 November 2018 at 18:45, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> As long as queries involve tuple routing that touches multiple not yet
> seen partitions, someone doing conflicting operations directly on multiple
> partitions in a transaction will have to be ready to see deadlocks.
> Maybe, we can document that.

Perhaps it's good enough. A guess there's at least a workaround of
doing LOCK TABLE <root_partitioned_table> in the CREATE INDEX /
TRUNCATE session.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Dent 2018-11-10 10:14:50 Re: Patch for Delta Materialized View Refreshes
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-11-10 05:01:27 Re: Skylake-S warning