Re: [HACKERS] Decimal64 and Decimal128

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Feng Tian <ftian(at)vitessedata(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Decimal64 and Decimal128
Date: 2018-11-12 22:01:33
Message-ID: CAKJS1f91ko43jo_38xaOHiqCmsUyKZ5gYSQDjqrXXJu5owjDGQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 13 November 2018 at 10:39, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> ... and it has just been voted into the next revision of the C language:
>
> https://gustedt.wordpress.com/2018/11/12/c2x/

Nice. Maybe we can get DECFLOAT into core around PostgreSQL 32 or so :-)

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2018-11-12 22:46:19 Re: libpq debug log
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2018-11-12 21:39:05 Re: [HACKERS] Decimal64 and Decimal128