Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations
Date: 2018-09-11 03:49:43
Message-ID: CAKJS1f91G=uUO3Y2pW8Ykiy8i6=U71wo+TT-PyKsgRNoWD96QQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9 July 2018 at 13:26, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I started looking over this patch and have a few comments:

Hi Konstantin,

Wondering, are you going to be submitting an updated patch for this
commitfest? If not then I think we can mark this as returned with
feedback as it's been waiting on author for quite a while now.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2018-09-11 05:23:09 Re: Retrieve memory size allocated by libpq
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-09-11 03:14:09 Re: Can I just reload the slave to change primary_conninfo?