Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date: 2018-01-10 01:55:28
Message-ID: CAKJS1f9+dHias8tPX2JxmY4o3amto3uVeyHNc77i+EGYG8+1Cg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9 January 2018 at 21:40, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Sorry about the absence in the last few days. I will post a new version
> addressing various review comments by the end of this week.

One more thing I discovered while troubleshooting a bug Beena reported
in the run-time partition pruning patch is that
classify_partition_bounding_keys properly does;

if (EXPR_MATCHES_PARTKEY(leftop, partattno, partexpr))
constexpr = rightop;
else if (EXPR_MATCHES_PARTKEY(rightop, partattno, partexpr))
constexpr = leftop;
else
/* Clause not meant for this column. */
continue;

for OpExpr clauses, but does not do the same for leftop for the
ScalarArrayOpExpr test.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2018-01-10 02:28:44 Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.
Previous Message David Rowley 2018-01-10 01:51:51 Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning