| From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Instability in partition_prune test? |
| Date: | 2018-04-13 03:34:05 |
| Message-ID: | CAKJS1f8j24tUX_nOwACiM=UO5jrMrDz8ca0xbG0vhVgfWph0ZA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 13 April 2018 at 14:41, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I'll just need to go think about how we can make the test stable now.
Thomas and I discussed this a bit off-list.
The attached basically adds:
set max_parallel_workers = 0;
before the Parallel Append tests.
All those tests were intended to do what check that "(never executed)"
appeared for the correct nodes. They still do that.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| make_partition_prune_tests_stable_hopefully.patch | application/octet-stream | 9.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2018-04-13 03:35:15 | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2018-04-13 03:29:21 | Re: wal_consistency_checking reports an inconsistency on master branch |