Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT
Date: 2019-02-03 08:39:56
Message-ID: CAKJS1f8SZqFcOSws4i4BwZ-4i9+Ki9_n40ta+_WY0=OPodAUMQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 3 Feb 2019 at 21:00, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
> >> There is a test, that is good! Charater "." should be backslashed in the
> >> regexpr.
> >
> > Yeah, you're right. I wonder if we should fix the test of them in
> > another patch.
>
> From a software engineering perspective, I'd say that a feature and its
> tests really belong to the same patch.

I meant to say "fix the rest" if them, not "the test of them".

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-02-03 09:07:37 Re: [PATCH] Pass COPT and PROFILE to CXXFLAGS as well
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2019-02-03 08:14:44 Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs