Re: Parallelized polymorphic aggs, and aggtype vs aggoutputtype

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallelized polymorphic aggs, and aggtype vs aggoutputtype
Date: 2016-06-22 03:19:02
Message-ID: CAKJS1f81JMq-EVygn_oyBsehsbqxE5=Xve-PEhRD_WuOeYkJrA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 20 June 2016 at 22:19, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I've gone and implemented the dummy argument approach for
> deserialization functions.
>
> If we go with this, I can then write the docs for 35.10 which'll serve
> to explain parallel user defined aggregates in detail.

I've attached my proposed patch for the user defined aggregate docs.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
create_aggregate_docs.patch application/octet-stream 3.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2016-06-22 08:11:41 Re: Postgres_fdw join pushdown - wrong results with whole-row reference
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-06-22 01:51:16 Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver