Re: Should the docs have a warning about pg_stat_reset()?

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should the docs have a warning about pg_stat_reset()?
Date: 2019-04-11 01:43:55
Message-ID: CAKJS1f80o98hcfSk8j=fdN09S7Sjz+vuzhEwbyQqvHJb_sZw0g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 07:33, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> IMO the answer for $SUBJECT is yes.

Here's what I had in mind.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg_stat_reset_warning.patch application/octet-stream 973 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2019-04-11 01:47:01 Re: [PATCH v20] GSSAPI encryption support
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2019-04-11 00:48:35 Re: [HACKERS] Weaker shmem interlock w/o postmaster.pid