Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions?

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions?
Date: 2019-06-09 05:07:39
Message-ID: CAKJS1f-zof2ZAnDLWND+ReuXE4qqczs79_GGOu9zfJPHBftbZA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 at 16:21, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> I meant it should say "into which it should be divided" and not "by which it
> should be divided INTO", which has too many prepositions. This is still an
> issue:

It now reads "divided by" instead of "divided into".

> | these two types of workload, it is important to make the right decisions
> | early, as re-partitioning large quantities of data can be ...

I've added a comma after "early".

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
part_doc_master_v3.patch application/octet-stream 5.3 KB
part_doc_pg11_v3.patch application/octet-stream 5.2 KB
part_doc_pg10_v3.patch application/octet-stream 5.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2019-06-09 05:11:01 Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions?
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2019-06-09 04:21:42 Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions?