|From:||David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>|
|To:||Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Subject:||Re: CONNECTION LIMIT and Parallel Query don't play well together|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox|
On 27 January 2017 at 03:53, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Sorry, this had slipped through the cracks -- I'm having a very hard
> time keeping up with the flow of patches and emails. But it looks
> good to me, except that it seems like CountDBBackends() needs the same
> fix (and probably a corresponding documentation update).
Thanks for looking at this.
Looks like there's a few other usages of CountDBBackends() which
require background workers to be counted too, so I ended up creating
CountDBConnections() as I didn't really think adding a bool flag to
CountDBBackends was so nice.
I thought about renaming CountUserBackends() to become
CountUserConnections(), but I've not. Although, perhaps its better to
break any third party stuff that uses that so that authors can review
which behaviour they need rather than have their extension silently
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
|Next Message||Andres Freund||2017-01-29 21:12:19||Re: Create a separate test file for exercising system views|
|Previous Message||Tom Lane||2017-01-29 21:02:21||Create a separate test file for exercising system views|