Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions?

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions?
Date: 2019-06-12 22:36:44
Message-ID: CAKJS1f-bYqk9EtWKE-HmizfQ_72K+iq7KTD4kh9L-Vr4mHOdNg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 at 17:49, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I noticed a typo:
>
> "...able to handle partition hierarchies up a few thousand partitions"
>
> s/up/up to/g
>
> I'm inclined to add one more word though, as:
>
> "...able to handle partition hierarchies with up to a few thousand partitions"
>
> or
>
> "...able to handle partition hierarchies containing up to a few
> thousand partitions"

Thanks for noticing that. I've pushed a fix.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-06-12 23:46:13 Re: [PATCH] ruleutils: Fix subqueries with shadowed aliases
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-06-12 22:14:54 Re: Question about some changes in 11.3