Re: EXPLAIN VERBOSE with parallel Aggregate

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: EXPLAIN VERBOSE with parallel Aggregate
Date: 2016-04-28 01:13:22
Message-ID: CAKJS1f-Wzf1UCmC1yS6_amUHsQPOK9+CvE856BQ6-a2==T0zdA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 28 April 2016 at 04:08, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:38 PM, David Rowley
>> The patch looks good. The only other thing I thought about was perhaps
>> it would be a good idea to re-add the sanity checks in execQual.c.
>> Patch for that is attached.
>>
>> I removed the aggoutputtype check, as I only bothered adding that in
>> the first place because I lost the aggpartial field in some previous
>> revision of the parallel aggregate developments. I'd say the
>> aggpartial check makes it surplus to requirements.
>
> OK, committed.

Great. Thank you.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-04-28 01:14:16 Re: Shared memory and processes
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2016-04-28 01:12:08 Re: Shared memory and processes