Re: Internal error XX000 with enable_partition_pruning=on, pg 11 beta1 on Debian

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Phil Florent <philflorent(at)hotmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Internal error XX000 with enable_partition_pruning=on, pg 11 beta1 on Debian
Date: 2018-07-16 04:27:18
Message-ID: CAKJS1f-KciO1kueTz0iHcMiqR7DjKW9=Gopc=4hh73n1BkAXwg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 16 July 2018 at 12:55, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Thinking about this some more, I don't quite see any reason that the
> partitioned_rels for a single hierarchy couldn't just be a Bitmapset
> instead of an IntList.

Of course, this is not possible since we can't pass a List of
Bitmapsets to the executor due to Bitmapset not being a node type.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Phil Florent 2018-07-16 04:56:41 RE: Internal error XX000 with enable_partition_pruning=on, pg 11 beta1 on Debian
Previous Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2018-07-16 04:16:22 RE: How to make partitioning scale better for larger numbers of partitions