From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |
Date: | 2018-04-06 00:06:08 |
Message-ID: | CAKJS1f-DS7W4S-7EaKZFfowY3+MhH4efQ29=Xd4Ms_xTcnQbqA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 6 April 2018 at 12:02, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 6 April 2018 at 10:35, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> The only other thing I noted on this pass is that we could get rid of:
>
> + /* go check the next clause. */
> + if (unsupported_clause)
> + break;
>
> and just "continue" instead of "break" in all cases apart from case
> PARTCLAUSE_UNSUPPORTED:
I should have said remove:
+ if (unsupported_clause)
The "break" would still be required.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2018-04-06 00:28:17 | Re: Online enabling of checksums |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2018-04-06 00:02:11 | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |