Re: bms_prev_member won't work correctly if bitmapword is 64-bits

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bms_prev_member won't work correctly if bitmapword is 64-bits
Date: 2018-04-23 21:23:57
Message-ID: CAKJS1f-CURRUmBFNxAX23F8ZGWZkx4P=AEabJzhJP_pMC7atMg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 24 April 2018 at 03:00, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> wrote:
> Thank you, pushed

Thanks!

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2018-04-23 21:41:16 Re: [HACKERS] Clock with Adaptive Replacement
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-04-23 21:10:24 Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?