Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date: 2018-02-17 22:54:30
Message-ID: CAKJS1f-7Pcxf1-6Pq9z4Sa6uco_tQw309Hda5xpjuTYMFQO=VA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 17 February 2018 at 22:24, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2 February 2018 at 23:03, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> I started wondering if it's not such a good idea to make
>> PartitionClauseInfo a Node at all?
> That sounds like a good idea.
>
> A patch which puts this back is attached.

Please find attached an updated patch. The previous one must've got a
bit mangled in a bad merge.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
make_PartitionClauseInfo_a_nonnode_type_v2.patch application/octet-stream 5.2 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-02-17 23:48:37 Re: missing toast table for pg_policy
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-02-17 22:17:24 Re: [HACKERS] Cache lookup errors with functions manipulation object addresses