| From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |
| Date: | 2018-02-17 22:54:30 |
| Message-ID: | CAKJS1f-7Pcxf1-6Pq9z4Sa6uco_tQw309Hda5xpjuTYMFQO=VA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 17 February 2018 at 22:24, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2 February 2018 at 23:03, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> I started wondering if it's not such a good idea to make
>> PartitionClauseInfo a Node at all?
> That sounds like a good idea.
>
> A patch which puts this back is attached.
Please find attached an updated patch. The previous one must've got a
bit mangled in a bad merge.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| make_PartitionClauseInfo_a_nonnode_type_v2.patch | application/octet-stream | 5.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-02-17 23:48:37 | Re: missing toast table for pg_policy |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-02-17 22:17:24 | Re: [HACKERS] Cache lookup errors with functions manipulation object addresses |