Re: backup.old

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Steve Pribyl <Steve(dot)Pribyl(at)akunacapital(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: backup.old
Date: 2015-10-07 19:25:48
Message-ID: CAKFQuwbuOHVYfBZqNjB5FtJKBCE3A3bcyAMXY34evK-W7CajVA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Steve Pribyl <Steve(dot)Pribyl(at)akunacapital(dot)com>
wrote:

> Great, dur(rtfm), so is it save to delete the backup.old, if the db is not
> in backup mode.
>
​I don't see anything that would cause "backup.old" to be linked to an
active backup if there was one in progress...and as far as I can tell a
successfully completed backup doesn't leave around any such file either.
So it should be safe to delete regardless of what pg_is_in_backup returns.
If that returns true then I would be concerned that something (or someone)
else is messing with the backup/data directory ​and that something likely
also introduced backup.old

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc Mamin 2015-10-07 19:27:41 Re: Best practices for aggregate table design
Previous Message Paul Ramsey 2015-10-07 19:25:37 PostGIS 2.2.0 Released