Re: Performant queries on table with many boolean columns

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: Rob Imig <rimig88(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performant queries on table with many boolean columns
Date: 2016-04-21 16:12:49
Message-ID: CAKFQuwbij6yfxixc-LSq6dtt9a=6cTZyHNJwJnrG0-PGAmGHCA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> wrote:

> looks like a deal for contrib/bloom index in upcoming 9.6 release
>> ​Curious, it doesn't look like it will work with booleans out of the box.
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/bloom.html
>>
>
> There is no rocket science here:
> # create table x (v bool);
> # create index i on x using bloom ((v::int4));
> # set enable_seqscan=off; --because of empty table
> # explain select * from x where v::int4 = 1;
> QUERY PLAN
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Bitmap Heap Scan on x (cost=25.08..35.67 rows=14 width=1)
> Recheck Cond: ((v)::integer = 1)
> -> Bitmap Index Scan on i (cost=0.00..25.07 rows=14 width=0)
> Index Cond: ((v)::integer = 1)
>
> Or cast it to "char" type (with quoting!)
>
>
​At that point you should just forget bool exists and define the columns as
int4.

I'll give you points for making it work but its not a solution I'd be proud
to offer up.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2016-04-21 16:36:37 Re: Performant queries on table with many boolean columns
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2016-04-21 10:04:13 Re: Performant queries on table with many boolean columns