Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vladimir Rusinov <vrusinov(at)google(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Cynthia Shang <cynthia(dot)shang(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
Date: 2017-01-26 22:45:15
Message-ID: CAKFQuwbhwck9jiyB0tqHGwVLKTXC7D=feocx2Fdkrie_F_Zc=A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> I *personally* don't think it's worth
> changing all this without taking more care about backward compat than
> we're apparently willing to do. I'm ok with loosing that argument. I
> just don't think the previous concensus for a narrower change can be
> used for the wider one
> ​.
>

​It would probably help others if you could brain dump a bit as to the
benefit of the status-quo compared to both the 9.6 behavior and the all-in
one.

Honestly, the reference to the camel sticking their nose in a tent was
supposed to be taken humorously, the serious explanation that it meant to
convey was already very well presented by Robert. The only reason I added
the wiki link was to give those who would have no clue about the metaphor a
chance at understanding it.

I actually took your response as: "why the f**k is he talking about
camels?" and started laughing...

Dave

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jia Yu 2017-01-26 22:48:59 Re: IndexBuild Function call fcinfo cannot access memory
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2017-01-26 22:36:17 Re: pg_ls_dir & friends still have a hard-coded superuser check