Re: BUG #19392: PG_UPGRADE is non-functional on Windows

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Laing <jeff(dot)laing(at)spatialnetworx(dot)ai>
Cc: PostgreSQL Bug List <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: BUG #19392: PG_UPGRADE is non-functional on Windows
Date: 2026-02-04 23:38:46
Message-ID: CAKFQuwba0jCCNAZhi5jYc9pbVv0FWq7gAVTdz6QbaVFTpTjFTw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Wed, Feb 4, 2026, 13:53 Jeff Laing <jeff(dot)laing(at)spatialnetworx(dot)ai> wrote:

> . It’s not clear why it included the word “postmaster” in the error
> message which sent me off down a rathole of “it has no idea what it’s
> doing, perhaps its connecting to the wrong instance, etc…”
>
>
>
Postmaster is the name of the executable that is the server program.

We also don't have a formal bug tracker, so nothing exists to close.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Laing 2026-02-05 02:57:13 RE: BUG #19392: PG_UPGRADE is non-functional on Windows
Previous Message Jeff Laing 2026-02-04 21:53:46 RE: BUG #19392: PG_UPGRADE is non-functional on Windows